Originally posted by iTim:I think you have answered your own question here, Alex.
Originally posted by iTim:I think you have answered your own question here, Alex.
Originally posted by ahn1991:I mean, statistically speaking the more material you have the fewer plays each one will have assuming you haven't gravitated towards a particular favorite. It's the same argument people use regarding setlist variation when they groan about hearing Pride for the millionth time.
From the standpoint of wanting a collection, sure I'd gather a million bootlegs if I had the time and resources to store that much. However, I'd rather have one solid bootleg that best encompasses the tour, especially if I want to listen to a gig in full and not Frankenstein the best performances together. From the standpoint of free material, of course it's easy to say there are no diminishing returns because it doesn't cost anything to accumulate 15,000 bootlegs on this site. If I'm going to pay money for a recording, it had better have something that I can't already get for free, otherwise it really isn't financially justifiable.
Let's not misunderstand, I have a hefty collection of bootlegs myself. Many of them I've given a listen in full and moved to storage.
Originally posted by ahn1991:This is very true. Maybe I'll get it when the wallet isn't feeling as light thanks to the new shows they just announced.
Originally posted by U2sBiggestFan:Silly question but does anybody else have trouble getting the vinyl paper cases into the cardboard ones?
Originally posted by miryclay:I'm buying this in three months
Originally posted by miryclay:I'm buying this in three months
Originally posted by DutchU2Fan:[..]
Same
Originally posted by Timk68:The box sets seem to hold value well , if not increase
Originally posted by Timk68:The box sets seem to hold value well , if not increase