Originally posted by LSMelo:Hi there. Can you tell us what improvments were made?
Is it worthful to have the WAV/FLAC files to keep instead the mp3? I like to have all in lossless as the primary source of my bootlegs.
I just love this show!!!
Originally posted by LSMelo:Hi there. Can you tell us what improvments were made?
Is it worthful to have the WAV/FLAC files to keep instead the mp3? I like to have all in lossless as the primary source of my bootlegs.
I just love this show!!!
Originally posted by MountTemple:[..]
La señal Wav de u2.com es malisima, asi que si la transformo a Flac sonaria muy mal al extender las frecuencias en forma forzada. Disculpame pero lo que emite u2.com no es de las mejores señales.
Abrazoos!!!
Originally posted by noiseless:First of all, I'd like to say I did not bother to listen to all sources being shared here or anywhere else. I listened to three sources. All of them sounded pretty much the same to me.
I cannot understand the discussion about bitrates and lossiness, no matter how hard I try. This is a webcast @192k. So take it or leave it, it will never get any better than 192k no matter how big you blow the files. And it sounds pretty damn good for a webcast, I think.
The only reason why this show sounds bad is because one of the channels is phase reversed. I cannot understand why people don't hear this. Appearently most people's ears are insensitive to phase inversion but as soon as the problem is solved, everybody will hear how much better the music sounds. Phase inversion cancels out many parts of the music and makes music sound canny and extremely unnatural.
So. I took a source and phase corrected it. That's all. And I'm pretty sure that did help a lot more than 'remastering' the show. It just does not make sense to EQ a show as long as it has fundamental flaws.
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=82FBODUE