CS4 for me, CS5 wasn't much of an improvement (but used many more resources) so I assumed CS6 wasn't worth "buying"...
CS5 was a disappointing resource hog, yes. CS5.5 was lovely though, and CS6 improves upon that still. If you have 4GB of RAM or more then it's worth "buying".
CS5 was a disappointing resource hog, yes. CS5.5 was lovely though, and CS6 improves upon that still. If you have 4GB of RAM or more then it's worth "buying".
I have 3 GB RAM right now and I can't use any more since 32-bits architecture doesn't recognise more than 3GB but I could give CS6 a try if it's that good.
32-bit? Get out of the 00s 64-bit 8 GB over here. Not that I really ever go over 4. Apart from with this project obviously. CS6 is worth it, yes.
We should really stop posting this nonsense in the photography topic.
It's actually very photography related, methinks. Somewhere between tech and photo topics actually
I really hate how photoshop is now present on almost every photography we see each day, everywhere. I miss the old analogic days, I really do.
Agreed. Invisible shopping cart cats and Jim Carrey all have the wretched whiff of GC about them though, don't they?
As for the analogue days, I'm sort of with you. Photographers of old had more work to do to get the shot. That much is certain. And film has a quality of its own. Photoshop has opened up the possibilities for photography though. The possibilities are now almost limitless, and that makes me very happy.
Wow, really awesome pics Ross!
And I'm uploading some pics I took in Buenos Aires and in New York, so expect lots of photos here soon!