Originally posted by pleasegone:These Ultimate Classic Rock lists are so poorly written, and obviously have no proofreader. They rank SOI as the "worst" album at # 14, but praise the first five songs as strong, and then Pop at #11 is pretty much labeled a terrible album. Huh? I've seen this on their lists before where something ranked really low is full of compliments, and something ranked much, much higher is trashed. Me or just about anyone else on U2start could make a much more intelligent list in their sleep blindfolded while being hit with a hammer.
Originally posted by popmarter:[..]
Regardless of how it is written the list is fairly accurate as to how a lot of fans would rate the albums in order of preference.
Originally posted by RUMMY:Not sure if this adds anything to the conversation but if I could only have one album from the early era (1980-1983) I would take Under A Blood Red Sky over the three studio albums.
Originally posted by deanallison:[..]
There really isn’t that much missing from red rocks to make up the best of the early days. The full performance though that is. I’d take the Boy album over the cd version of under a blood red sky. But if I could have the full red rocks gig then I’d take that over the first 3 studio albums.