1. Literally every time we update that article / or make changes to the formatting it's going to revert to "2025" because that's what is in the date field. Adding in the "early" is a manual process. It's not a change based on any information whatsoever.

    Last I heard they hope to finish it up over the next couple of months and are looking at early next year for it.
  2. Good to know.. so at any rate, it may be a quiet next few months apart from other releases.. exciting times.. I can't wait to see what's new in the HTDAAB anniversary box set
  3. Old songs, new sound, new colours…these are the times
  4. Originally posted by u2wanderer1:[..]
    Literally every time we update that article / or make changes to the formatting it's going to revert to "2025" because that's what is in the date field. Adding in the "early" is a manual process. It's not a change based on any information whatsoever.

    Last I heard they hope to finish it up over the next couple of months and are looking at early next year for it.
    So an 8 year gap between albums let's not count SOS as that was a Stopgap mainly by the Edge ,I suppose it could be worse some of their contemporaries have much longer gaps between albums Aerosmith, GnR and The Cure ,Billy Joel,Phil Collins ,Kiss,Eagles,Radiohead, and many more who don't even bother anymore and just tour off their back catalogue as new music from older established artists is extremely hard to get airplay for and is largely ignored by their fanbase who just want to hear the old classics ( apart from U2s fans of course)
  5. U2 is so insane now with new music, a lot of people started to like them thanks to atomic city
  6. U2 should set free the edge with his guitar and you’ll have a true rock n roll album
  7. Is that so? That is pretty awesome!
  8. Originally posted by u2wanderer1:[..]
    Literally every time we update that article / or make changes to the formatting it's going to revert to "2025" because that's what is in the date field. Adding in the "early" is a manual process. It's not a change based on any information whatsoever.

    Last I heard they hope to finish it up over the next couple of months and are looking at early next year for it.
    Good to know! Thanks!
  9. Originally posted by u2wanderer1:[..]
    Literally every time we update that article / or make changes to the formatting it's going to revert to "2025" because that's what is in the date field. Adding in the "early" is a manual process. It's not a change based on any information whatsoever.

    Last I heard they hope to finish it up over the next couple of months and are looking at early next year for it.
    Thank you for letting us know!
  10. Originally posted by u2wanderer1:[..]
    Literally every time we update that article / or make changes to the formatting it's going to revert to "2025" because that's what is in the date field. Adding in the "early" is a manual process. It's not a change based on any information whatsoever.

    Last I heard they hope to finish it up over the next couple of months and are looking at early next year for it.
    I see! I didn’t realise.
  11. Originally posted by u2wanderer1:[..]
    Literally every time we update that article / or make changes to the formatting it's going to revert to "2025" because that's what is in the date field. Adding in the "early" is a manual process. It's not a change based on any information whatsoever.

    Last I heard they hope to finish it up over the next couple of months and are looking at early next year for it.
    Awesome! Thanks!
  12. 200 Days until St. Patrick’s Day. So possibly 200 days until the album