Originally posted by mastrovox:Residency is a green solution...low co2 tour
Originally posted by mastrovox:Residency is a green solution...low co2 tour
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
Even though I strongly disagree with the writer when he dismisses literally everything the band have put out since 2004, I reckon he has a strong point when criticising the Vegas residency.
I understand this residency is exactly what the band/corporation has been dreaming of for many years: maximizing the profits of their worldwide acclaimed live shows, minimizing the financial and logistical risks, playing it safe with minimal changes from night to night and basically pulling sold out after sold out with close to zero effort. And that's exactly what makes me sad about it.
Originally posted by TheRefugee:When I hear talk of a Vegas residency I can’t help but think of The Fly switching channels and remarking that he’s definitely going through his “Fat Elvis period”. It might not be a tragedy, but it certainly is a little sad.
Originally posted by guykirk9:[..]
I don’t think it’s sad at all. Not like the band will play 160 shows over the course of the year hahaha.
The band is 60+, it’s just not a fair to compare to a young drugged out Elvis. I think they are just going through life, with the understanding that they won’t be in Vegas for a longer than a few shows.
Originally posted by mattfromcanada:[..]
Is the length / duration known or speculated? They did 8 Runs at MSG in 2015 - does that count as a residency? Cause from what I recall, that got glowing review....
Originally posted by mattfromcanada:[..]
Is the length / duration known or speculated? They did 8 Runs at MSG in 2015 - does that count as a residency? Cause from what I recall, that got glowing review....
Originally posted by u2wanderer1:[..]
the article in Billboard mentioned shows over three months, with no consecutive nights at the venue.