U2:UV Achtung Baby at the Sphere
Legs (1): 2023-2024
Shows: 40
Tickets:
  1. I imagine all photos in the book that were on the press kit U2.com page
  2. "Nearly 140 mostly-unseen photographs"

    Would suggest some, if not all, are from U2.com lol.
  3. invalid instagram post

    what do you think?
  4. Looking back at footage from the Sphere shows, I think that turntable stage restricted the band a bit, especially for Bono. U2 shows usually allow for more manoeuvre it's not just about screen visuals but also action. I know Bono has got older and less nimble onstage but it just looks restrictive overall.

    Also the return of The Fly character almost seems like a gesture, he stuck on the shades for a few songs but The Fly also has an attitude and swagger that was missing. They could really have had the character's view on the use of mobile phones in the show for example, "you haven't come all the way out here to film us have ya?" for example. At least when he brought MacPhisto back he embodied the character again. Maybe there's a lesson there in trying to revive the past, still his best look though.
  5. I think Sphere was about the screen, and because of that the magic - connection with audience was quite often missing. And people filming and posting on social media were crucial to create a buzz. Many fans are just not rich enough to attend, those shows were full of influencers or celebrities or rich people that wanted to show off. And buzz created from posts on social media was more than welcomed...
    As for The Fly with the swagger, they were probably contractually oblige to what to say as well, as the owner is MAGA...
  6. What were they supposed to do- dust off the 30-year-old outfits and relive the exact same roles? Nah..it's nice to revisit some of the personalities like MacPhisto and the Fly but it's nice that it was more of a nod to them than a mandatory replay of 1992.
    They're not the same people that they were when AB came out..Yeah the lack of stage space and freedom definitely felt weird, and it seemed almost unnatural to have the band confined to that space. UTEOTW (or whatever it was) was cool at some points when Bono went up to the crowd, but that separation between audience and band just felt weird. Don't get me wrong, the sound alone was worth the price of admission for me, and I'm not rich by any means. The visuals were just icing on the cake. But yeah, U2 is best experienced up close and personal.
  7. Originally posted by LordVader1:I think Sphere was about the screen, and because of that the magic - connection with audience was quite often missing. And people filming and posting on social media were crucial to create a buzz. Many fans are just not rich enough to attend, those shows were full of influencers or celebrities or rich people that wanted to show off. And buzz created from posts on social media was more than welcomed...
    As for The Fly with the swagger, they were probably contractually oblige to what to say as well, as the owner is MAGA...
    I saw a few shows at Sphere. From the seats and from the floor. I felt that the whole thing built a connection with the band nicely. And if you were lucky enough to get onto the floor, it was an incredibly intimate venue. The stage allowed you to get around all sides of the band, and to get close. Better than most of their live shows have done in stadiums. Felt similar in a way to the Experience / Innocence shows, when the band were playing on the catwalk. I rarely paid much attention to the screens when I was on the floor, the band were right there, and I thought it was great.

    Never paid more than $300 for a floor ticket. Yes there was some scrambling involved to get them at times, but in the end it worked out. And at times I lined up, others I didn't and just walked in at showtime. Regardless of the route I found the venue great. Even the back rail of the floor provided a view which kept me focused on the band and not on the screen.

    And I was surrounded most night by fans. People I had recognized from years of shows. There were a lot of familiar faces each time I went. Vegas was crawling with fans. I got to spend time with friends from Amsterdam, Buenos Aires, UK, Australia, Ireland and more. The celebrities and influencers? All up in the very small VIP area, well away from the rest of the venue. The only time I paid much attention was when Bono would single one out, like he did with Pricilla Presley. I do think the price affected the number of shows many of us could take in. I'd have love to do more, but the wallet got the best of me.

    The seats? They were fine. I did find I focused more on the screen, but it was able to create a bit of intimacy with the band you miss on a smaller screen. And you could watch them perform on stage and look at the screen at the same time. And I do think it was a good idea to go minimal for some of the songs when it came to the screen. Focused me back in on the band instead of the screens at times.

    And I will say the sound system was insane. It really did make it feel Bono was talking right into your ear at times. And at least one of the shows I'd put right up among some of my favorite I've ever seen U2 do.

    Definitely felt more of a connection than most of the bigger shows I've seen in stadiums. And I liked it better than Elevation / Vertigo as well as you didn't need to choose between having a view of the band and having a view of the screens.
  8. Originally posted by u2wanderer1:[..]
    I saw a few shows at Sphere. From the seats and from the floor. I felt that the whole thing built a connection with the band nicely. And if you were lucky enough to get onto the floor, it was an incredibly intimate venue. The stage allowed you to get around all sides of the band, and to get close. Better than most of their live shows have done in stadiums. Felt similar in a way to the Experience / Innocence shows, when the band were playing on the catwalk. I rarely paid much attention to the screens when I was on the floor, the band were right there, and I thought it was great.

    Never paid more than $300 for a floor ticket. Yes there was some scrambling involved to get them at times, but in the end it worked out. And at times I lined up, others I didn't and just walked in at showtime. Regardless of the route I found the venue great. Even the back rail of the floor provided a view which kept me focused on the band and not on the screen.

    And I was surrounded most night by fans. People I had recognized from years of shows. There were a lot of familiar faces each time I went. Vegas was crawling with fans. I got to spend time with friends from Amsterdam, Buenos Aires, UK, Australia, Ireland and more. The celebrities and influencers? All up in the very small VIP area, well away from the rest of the venue. The only time I paid much attention was when Bono would single one out, like he did with Pricilla Presley. I do think the price affected the number of shows many of us could take in. I'd have love to do more, but the wallet got the best of me.

    The seats? They were fine. I did find I focused more on the screen, but it was able to create a bit of intimacy with the band you miss on a smaller screen. And you could watch them perform on stage and look at the screen at the same time. And I do think it was a good idea to go minimal for some of the songs when it came to the screen. Focused me back in on the band instead of the screens at times.

    And I will say the sound system was insane. It really did make it feel Bono was talking right into your ear at times. And at least one of the shows I'd put right up among some of my favorite I've ever seen U2 do.

    Definitely felt more of a connection than most of the bigger shows I've seen in stadiums. And I liked it better than Elevation / Vertigo as well as you didn't need to choose between having a view of the band and having a view of the screens.
    Id agree with so much of this, but the main thing is the sound. I’ll never get over how good it was. Visuals best ever but the sound was beyond the best ever for a concert. Never be topped at any other venue. It was crystal clear.
  9. Originally posted by bonoschild:What were they supposed to do- dust off the 30-year-old outfits and relive the exact same roles? Nah..it's nice to revisit some of the personalities like MacPhisto and the Fly but it's nice that it was more of a nod to them than a mandatory replay of 1992.
    They're not the same people that they were when AB came out..Yeah the lack of stage space and freedom definitely felt weird, and it seemed almost unnatural to have the band confined to that space. UTEOTW (or whatever it was) was cool at some points when Bono went up to the crowd, but that separation between audience and band just felt weird. Don't get me wrong, the sound alone was worth the price of admission for me, and I'm not rich by any means. The visuals were just icing on the cake. But yeah, U2 is best experienced up close and personal.
    I didn't expect a 30-odd year old Bono but at least a bit more imagination and use of the character. But yeah, that aside the stage was restrictive I guess and the crowd just felt a bit static instead of being part of the show.
  10. In a way , Sphere shows were some of the best shows ive seen of the band (over 60 now sine 1984) . The sound was incredible and that probably moved it up some levels for me
  11. Originally posted by u2wanderer1:[..]
    I saw a few shows at Sphere. From the seats and from the floor. I felt that the whole thing built a connection with the band nicely. And if you were lucky enough to get onto the floor, it was an incredibly intimate venue. The stage allowed you to get around all sides of the band, and to get close. Better than most of their live shows have done in stadiums. Felt similar in a way to the Experience / Innocence shows, when the band were playing on the catwalk. I rarely paid much attention to the screens when I was on the floor, the band were right there, and I thought it was great.

    Never paid more than $300 for a floor ticket. Yes there was some scrambling involved to get them at times, but in the end it worked out. And at times I lined up, others I didn't and just walked in at showtime. Regardless of the route I found the venue great. Even the back rail of the floor provided a view which kept me focused on the band and not on the screen.

    And I was surrounded most night by fans. People I had recognized from years of shows. There were a lot of familiar faces each time I went. Vegas was crawling with fans. I got to spend time with friends from Amsterdam, Buenos Aires, UK, Australia, Ireland and more. The celebrities and influencers? All up in the very small VIP area, well away from the rest of the venue. The only time I paid much attention was when Bono would single one out, like he did with Pricilla Presley. I do think the price affected the number of shows many of us could take in. I'd have love to do more, but the wallet got the best of me.

    The seats? They were fine. I did find I focused more on the screen, but it was able to create a bit of intimacy with the band you miss on a smaller screen. And you could watch them perform on stage and look at the screen at the same time. And I do think it was a good idea to go minimal for some of the songs when it came to the screen. Focused me back in on the band instead of the screens at times.

    And I will say the sound system was insane. It really did make it feel Bono was talking right into your ear at times. And at least one of the shows I'd put right up among some of my favorite I've ever seen U2 do.

    Definitely felt more of a connection than most of the bigger shows I've seen in stadiums. And I liked it better than Elevation / Vertigo as well as you didn't need to choose between having a view of the band and having a view of the screens.
    Completely agree. As somebody who could not have been more skeptical about the whole thing and who is not a fan of Vegas (to put it mildly), my two shows (both GA) were wonderful for the reasons you mention. It was a perfect mix of spectacle and intimacy down there in the GA. It felt like a small venue show with this immense visual experience to back it up. Fan participation was very good and much better than the stadium shows I've attended in the past.

    And that version of Love is Blindness made the whole trip worth it and then some.
  12. Agree with so much of what U2W1 said, including about being more focused on the band when on the floor, except my perspective was from a highly restricted view on P1. Thankfully, I’d had the full screen experience up in P3 on the Friday night so I didn’t let the compromised view bother me on the Saturday night. I just cherished the memories of the night before and focused my attention on the band the whole time. Again, delighting in the incredible sound.

    In terms of the stage being restrictive, I didn’t see it that way.
    1) He had the central riser with the fixed microphone stand that he spun around on;
    2) He roamed around the platter, interacting easily with the other members
    3) The square turntable enabled him to face fans in 3 different directions
    4) The platform for ETEOTW brought him down close and touching the fans.
    Yes, maybe less dynamic than what we’re used to but still more flexible than a traditional theatre style stage, even one with a runway.