1. Should they do it? Probably not. Would I still go? Yeah. To be honest I think the best possible solution is that Bono does more Surrender shows. I'd love to see that again
  2. Nope
  3. Absolutely not. They also shouldn't tour without Adam, Edge or Bono. Missing a single show is ok, but an entire tour is something else
  4. These four guys used to be called ‚The Larry Mullen Band‘ - if only for a lunch break. Enough said. There‘s no U2 missing any of the original members.
  5. I’d rather they retire then replace any of the members. Not the kind of band i want them to be.
  6. Please no. we will probably get Dave Grohl on drums...
  7. Of course not. Don't be rediculous.



    silly question...
  8. Unless they get Dave Grohl , Stewart Copeland or Travis Barker as a temporary stand inšŸ¤£ but seriously they should hold off touring until he's ready.
  9. No.
    And if they would tour without Larry, he will never come back.
  10. No, of course not, U2 is a 4 persons band.
  11. Originally posted by popmarter: Unless they get Dave Grohl , Stewart Copeland or Travis Barker as a temporary stand inšŸ¤£ but seriously they should hold off touring until he's ready.
    Always loved Stewart's drumming skills ! An interesting composer & Film / TV music scorer too.
  12. No. We waited for Bono on 360 and Edges daughter in Vertigo. This is the same.