Please stop telling me to show you a good example of AI use in art - do a bit of research yourself as there's plenty of stuff out there
"How can AI "enhance creativity and forward thinking"? " again do some research - do you want me to take you by the hand? If you find nothing then you aren't looking in the right places
I am a graphic artist, a web designer, a photographer, a videographer, a song-writer, a musician, a writer - need I go on to prove my stance?
You mention literature - I agree, people are thieving but to paraphrase Bono 'They're stealing from the thieves'. Of course I say that with my tongue firmly pressed inside my cheek but there is an element of truth in it also - and please don't ask me to explain that to you
Your man Shakespeare was a well-known plagiarist for one
And trust me you bardic tradition will never be under threat - well, I say that but the more AI learns then the better the results will be BUT this is where I agree that there needs to be legal regulation to separate the 'original' and the 'complied' for want of a better term
But my views on AI is it being used as a tool to aid a creative and not as a sole tool to extract ideas from others and exploit their work - though we have to admit that human plagiarism has done just that for 100s of years
My view is that a person who has an idea can use AI to expand on that idea and create something new and exciting - the origin of that idea lies within a human thought not an AI one
I simply asked for some examples of AI "enhancing creativity and forward thinking."
I'm not even sure we can agree on what those words mean when you won't even provide an example for me.
I think you're overlooking the obvious differences between this technology and old-fashioned plagiarism.
And I think you're missing the overwhelmingly negative consequences that simple "regulation" won't be able to deal with. To give one example that is different from U2Wanderer's, there is no way my college (or any other) can "regulate" itself out of the crisis in cheating (and therefore crisis in learning) caused by AI.
Anyway, I'm done with this discussion since it isn't even clear to me that you considered my points at all carefully or have any interest in actually persuading.
You apparently just want to tell me how stupid and short-sighted my position is.