Originally posted by hedyzera:california (there is no end to love) aged well
Originally posted by hedyzera:california (there is no end to love) aged well
Originally posted by RememberEveryMoment:This one has really grown for me, an amazing LP. The mastering just sucks. It's way too flat if. Listening to it with good headphones does not do justice to the headphones.
Originally posted by Fly40:In my opinion U2 are at their best with “sentimental songs” which can give you more feelings,could they be happiness or a desperate cry....I explain: Songs of Innocence is more a “rock” album with a fast pace ...songs like Miracle...California...Volcano...Raised by...so it’s not my cup of tea.I’d rather play stuff like Iris or Wave which have a lot of pathos
I prefer Experience ( it’s not the subject of this thread) because it’s more emotional.there is real life in most of the songs...like the intro or maybe Lights of Home ...Little Things.it’s a real personal trip and I find myself in it
Btw....SOI and SOE are albums in which i skip songs everytime.that gives the albums the absence of a completeness
Originally posted by bpt3:[..]
I know what you mean and tend to agree. For an album supposedly so "personal" for U2, SOI still falls flat for me most of the time, and maybe it's partly because it comes off like more of a straightforward "rock" album that just plows ahead without a whole lot of time for introspection. It might be more cohesive and have a more intelligible tracklisting than SOE, but SOE's "pathos", as you put it, tops SOI for me every time yet ("brush with mortality" / 2016 election re-writing excuses or not).
That said, both of these albums have fallen in ranking for me over time, despite still appreciating the concept of the two. Hoping whatever the band eventually comes up with next sounds fresh, new, experimental, and unafraid to sound their age.
Originally posted by bonoschild:[..]
How would U2 go about sounding their age?
Originally posted by bpt3:[..] they've appeared more anxious about sounding young and modern with their sound and less about truly innovating.
Originally posted by bonoschild:[..]
How would U2 go about sounding their age?