1. thnx

  2. even when it's not u2 But stil a great pièce for a collection, His master's voice

  3. hmmm whats this

  4. got it it, is the print for colonge

  5. Got it

  6. yeah great job the waiting was worth it
  7. PS:

    Please note that I'm holding up one of the (estimated) 500 "Mis-Packaged" copies where the insert was placed in front of the first record

    See U2SONGS for details: https://www.u2songs.com/news/u2w_special_article_record_store_day_woes_mis_packaged_u2_records

    No harm to the records though and the shrink wrap + sticker were still on it

    Indeed "were" as the item is now professionally unwrapped. Well, almost that is. When I got back home I discovered that I ran out of anti-static inner sleeves, so the records are still in their (cheap) paper sleeves
  8. Originally posted by BigGiRL:[..]
    PS:

    Please note that I'm holding up one of the (estimated) 500 "Mis-Packaged" copies where the insert was placed in front of the first record

    See U2SONGS for details: https://www.u2songs.com/news/u2w_special_article_record_store_day_woes_mis_packaged_u2_records

    No harm to the records though and the shrink wrap + sticker were still on it

    Indeed "were" as the item is now professionally unwrapped. Well, almost that is. When I got back home I discovered that I ran out of anti-static inner sleeves, so the records are still in their (cheap) paper sleeves
    so only the inner sleeve is a miss print but the records are the good ones ?

  9. ill suspect (and hope) this is how its looks like then
  10. No, no mis-print - just mis-packaged

    The insert (with "flashback to 4 songs of innocence" on one side and the band picture on the other side) was placed before the records and partly visible through the round die-cut hole.

    According to U2Songs, also number #0001 and #1000 were packaged this way: with the insert before the records.

    There were only a handful that had the wrong record inside, but that could be seen from the outside