Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]
Agreed.
If it's not in order though, it should be a classic JT-Tour setlist. That's how I feel anyway.
I also like earlier ideas that they play NOTHING from albums post-1987.
Wishful thinking, however.
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:[..]
Agreed.
If it's not in order though, it should be a classic JT-Tour setlist. That's how I feel anyway.
Originally posted by fleavox:to me the order is irrelevant, depending how they would put the songs or the narrative
Originally posted by RUMMY:[..]
Sounds good to me.
I also like earlier ideas that they play NOTHING from albums post-1987.
Wishful thinking, however.
Originally posted by fleavox:to me the order is irrelevant, depending how they would put the songs or the narrative
Originally posted by MoFoNYR15:[..]
The minute they decide to not play it in sequence, it'll give them the excuse to drop songs. Open with a few fast high energy songs and then kick into JT in full. Come back out for an encore then goodnight. Those saying out of sequence will keep an element of surprise are dead wrong. If you look at one set then I'm sure you'll see them all. We all know theres almost ZERO room for spontaneity at a u2 show. They proved that last tour. They need to play it in full and in order. That's fresh. They've never done anything like that before. Copying the outlineof the set from 1987 is a terrible idea imo.
Originally posted by MoFoNYR15:[..]
The minute they decide to not play it in sequence, it'll give them the excuse to drop songs. Open with a few fast high energy songs and then kick into JT in full. Come back out for an encore then goodnight. Those saying out of sequence will keep an element of surprise are dead wrong. If you look at one set then I'm sure you'll see them all. We all know theres almost ZERO room for spontaneity at a u2 show. They proved that last tour. They need to play it in full and in order. That's fresh. They've never done anything like that before. Copying the outlineof the set from 1987 is a terrible idea imo.
Originally posted by fleavox:[..]
It also depends the way that they will play the songs... if they will choose to make this similar of album's versions, or similar the tour in 1987, or new versions... they have 11 songs, so maybe they could to work of them in different ways...
Originally posted by MoFoNYR15:[..]
The minute they decide to not play it in sequence, it'll give them the excuse to drop songs. Open with a few fast high energy songs and then kick into JT in full. Come back out for an encore then goodnight. Those saying out of sequence will keep an element of surprise are dead wrong. If you look at one set then I'm sure you'll see them all. We all know theres almost ZERO room for spontaneity at a u2 show. They proved that last tour. They need to play it in full and in order. That's fresh. They've never done anything like that before. Copying the outlineof the set from 1987 is a terrible idea imo.
Originally posted by RUMMY:[..]
Jeez, Nick. Words like "dead wrong" and "terrible" in a single post. You have some venom in you today!
Originally posted by RUMMY:[..]
Jeez, Nick. Words like "dead wrong" and "terrible" in a single post. You have some venom in you today!
Originally posted by MoFoNYR15:[..]
Don't forget "zero" in all caps haha. I don't want to be negative because I'm truly excited about the upcoming year fir u2.