1. How can it be that you take images from different sources and take the original track from U2? Doesn't that ruin U2's reputation? Wouldn't it make sense to take the audio source from where the clips come from? Live Songs of Innocence + Experience audio is a gift to the fans, who paid for it, Paulo Vetri. It's not free for audio to put on YouTube is it?
  2. How many topics do we need
  3. I have to say I disagree with the OP on this one. Personally any official material that turns up anywhere I’m not bothered about it being used even if it is fanclub stuff. In fact I’m quite glad that for those that can’t or don’t want to order the physical fan club stuff that they can get access to it this way. The band make plenty of money out of fans it’s not the same as a taper putting a good amount of effort in to tape a show and receiving no financial gain then freely sharing it only for it to be used against their will or worse even to be sold by another party.
  4. Exactly....and why are some people so wound up about it and keen to generate multiple pile ons. Get a life
  5. Complain to Youtube please, we're not Vetri's support page.