BLU
Active topics


  1. Wkileaks has what?! : ))) Don't joke about that, it's a serious topic. Leaked documents show that there were numerous civil and child killings by US army. It's US army that has blood on their hands, it's US army that is on foreign soil. Thousands of lives were destroyed and now WikiLeaks are guilty because they gave te world official documents that showed the truth?



  2. Originally posted by Yogi:[..]

    Wkileaks has what?! : ))) Don't joke about that, it's a serious topic. Leaked documents show that there were numerous civil and child killings by US army. It's US army that has blood on their hands, it's US army that is on foreign soil. Thousands of lives were destroyed and now WikiLeaks are guilty because they gave te world official documents that showed the truth?






    Civi casualties will always be high when facing an enemy that has no problemns with using civilians for shields, and cover.

    Personally, it dont bother me that much since they killed almost 3,000 Americans. Not that I expect a European neomarxist 9/11 truther such as yourself to care.

    Any sympathy I may have had for the people of Afghanistan died on 9/11.
  3. And dont start with the truther talk. I can shoot down any 9/11 conspiracy theory faster than you can counter me.
  4. Also, that is the dumbest logic ever. The fact that the U.S. Army has killed innocent people somehow makes it okay for wikileaks to get people killed?

    Never mind the fact that civi casualties are meaningless without context. Was it on purpose, or an accident. Did they pick up a weapon? Where insurgents using them for cover? Where they in just the wrong place at the wrong time?

    In your mind the u.S. will always be in the wrong, and all members of the U.S. military are baby killers.

    Whats the Croatian for "Go ef yourself"?


  5. You also went to Iraq because of 9/11 and not one proof was found to relate Sadam with attacks. Sadam did deserve to die, but because of other things. But, we all know that USA gave him weapons and power.

    Originally posted by wtshnnfb01:Also, that is the dumbest logic ever. The fact that the U.S. Army has killed innocent people somehow makes it okay for wikileaks to get people killed?


    Don't be rediculous. WikiLeaks made the right thing because they revealed truth that US was hiding. Truth is more important then anything in the world.

    I don't know if you read any of leaked documents but there is one that describes how US soldiers killed all people that were attending a wedding party.

    And now you blame WikiLeaks?

    It's one thing to be a patriot and a whole another thing to make up your own truth.

  6. Originally posted by Yogi:[..]

    You also went to Iraq because of 9/11 and not one proof was found to relate Sadam with attacks. Sadam did deserve to die, but because of other things. But, we all know that USA gave him weapons and power.

    [..]

    Don't be rediculous. WikiLeaks made the right thing because they revealed truth that US was hiding. Truth is more important then anything in the world.

    I don't know if you read any of leaked documents but there is one that describes how US soldiers killed all people that were attending a wedding party.

    And now you blame WikiLeaks?

    It's one thing to be a patriot and a whole another thing to make up your own truth.




    The wedding party thing wasen't exactly new. It happened in 07, if I recall. The attacking aircraft was an AC-130 gunship. It was relatively well reported at the time.

    If your too ignorant to read the news, its not my problemn.

    And yes, Iraq was a mistake, but look at it now. Its stable, and the U.S. should pull out almost all forces this month unless something goes really wrong.

    Also, supposedly that little prick who leaked the documents is possibly facing the death penalty. Good I say. You know someone fails, when they use the "he was picked on as a child" excuse.

    You make it sound like the mission of U.S. troops in Afghanistan is soley to murder civis. Its not. Genereally speaking, if they shoot a civilian, they thought it was in there best intrest at the time, and there have been severael incidents where fear of killing covilians has cost U.S. forces there lives. Look up "Operation Red Wing" 19 good men died, because 4 Navy Seals woulnd't kill some civis, who had stumbled on them ,and they knew where gonna rat them out to the Taliban.
  7. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Red_Wing


    Also, I quite frankly stopped giving a damn about your opinion sometime between when you decided that Obamacare was the best thing to ever happen to the U.S, and when you coulnd't contain your joy that Polands president had died, just because he had diffrent views than you.
  8. You like to point out that I have never experience communism. Well you have never had to sight down the barrel of an M-4, and decide if someones a threat, and whether to engage them, or to risk the lives of you an your buddys. Never mind the fact that you usually only have seconds to decide if someones a threat. Most vetereans will tell you, when all else fails, its better to shoot first, and take any punishment later, since if your being punished your alive.

    You have never been to war, and you never will.

    In war there is ultimately only one rule. Survive.
  9. Wikileaks is fun by a deranged lefty attention whore who thinks all soldiers are baby killers even though he has never had to go to war.

    In other words, Yogi would get along with him perfectly.


  10. Are you insane?! I would never say something like that.


  11. You want me to find the page? You where about as giddy as someone can come off as in a forum.

    Your the nuts one.
  12. Furthermore all you know of my country is what you see in biased journals, and Michael Moores dumbass commie films.