Originally posted by cqleonardo:about Jon Bon Jovi... his problem is, when the band started he didn't know how to sing, so he would just bell notes out, the first three albums there is some crazy ass screaming on some songs and that fucked his voice up. In 1987 Bon Jovi was doing like, 5 shows a week, Jon's voice was so shot that he would inject steroids right on his vocal chords to be able to sing, on the next tour they lowed half tone on every track. He had some amazing moments from 1988 to 2013 but now his voice is just bad, very very bad. I blame it on smoking like a crazy train and the state and stress he had when Richie left in 2013....
Originally posted by NeonTiger64:I've seen that HTBA before, were the vocals partially prerecorded? Something seems up at 1:57. Either way, good effort but 360 was still his best vocally (well at least this millennium). Just listen to that Miss Sarajevo posted last page!
I'll admit, I was initially very disappointed in SOI due to the lack of deep opera style voice that he would bust out occasionally. Bono was at peak vocal performance at the end of 360 and it's a shame they didn't get the best of what that voice could do on record.
Check out 4:15 here:
[YouTube Video]
Originally posted by u2_michaelc:[..]
yeah i agree. its almost sad because i want Bon jovi to keep going and i want him sounding better :(
Originally posted by Rammie:You're a harsh lot on here. Have you ever tried singing as many songs as he does, constantly, all the time, day after day, night after night. The man and the band work relentlessly and for every song we hear, there are dozens we never get to hear but are still sung. Even in one single concert, the amount of effort he puts in is far more than most, if not every, band I've ever seen.
I thought his voice sounded excellent at London 1, but cracked two or three times at Amsterdam 1. I actually find it quite endearing. As seeing as I can't even speak for a day after a U2 gig, I think at 57 he does bloody well.
Originally posted by Rammie:You're a harsh lot on here. Have you ever tried singing as many songs as he does, constantly, all the time, day after day, night after night. The man and the band work relentlessly and for every song we hear, there are dozens we never get to hear but are still sung. Even in one single concert, the amount of effort he puts in is far more than most, if not every, band I've ever seen.
I thought his voice sounded excellent at London 1, but cracked two or three times at Amsterdam 1. I actually find it quite endearing. As seeing as I can't even speak for a day after a U2 gig, I think at 57 he does bloody well.
Originally posted by Rammie:You're a harsh lot on here. Have you ever tried singing as many songs as he does, constantly, all the time, day after day, night after night. The man and the band work relentlessly and for every song we hear, there are dozens we never get to hear but are still sung. Even in one single concert, the amount of effort he puts in is far more than most, if not every, band I've ever seen.
Originally posted by Rammie: As seeing as I can't even speak for a day after a U2 gig, I think at 57 he does bloody well.
Originally posted by germcevoy:He's a lazy vocalist these days. I can deal with that actual change in tone but his breathing and timing can be all over the place. He was particularly bad during RTSS. Even with a click track he managed to be all over the place.
I'm not sure if he was has one but I think if he spent some time with a vocal coach looking at the technical side of singing then we'd see some great improvements.