Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
Lol at dismissing ‘only 59 performances’ of Acrobat.
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
Lol at dismissing ‘only 59 performances’ of Acrobat.
Originally posted by deanallison:[..]
The song was released 30 years ago nearly, if they’ve played 312 shows since 360 I can’t imagine how many they’ve played since zoo tv so again it’s missed a ridiculous amount of shows, especially for such a great song.
Originally posted by KieranU2:Get your stats out for the lads.
It genuinely does not matter how many times each song was played, it's the fact they were played on stage by the band. It merely shows - even if they were rehearsed! - that the band are thinking about the music from that particular period in their career. That's the point I was pretty much making in the initial post, which spoke hypothetically and speculatively about an anniversary tour.
Originally posted by deanallison:[..]
The song was released 30 years ago nearly, if they’ve played 312 shows since 360 I can’t imagine how many they’ve played since zoo tv so again it’s missed a ridiculous amount of shows, especially for such a great song.
Originally posted by KieranU2:[..]
But what's your point? It's missed hundreds of shows but was played at 59 of the last 74 shows and we're here discussing the possibility of an AB / ZooTV anniversary show.
Originally posted by germcevoy:My point again. Infrequent performances of these songs every now and again tells a bigger story than some of these songs being played every night on one tour (in the way Dean has dismissed Acrobat). A one-off performance of Zoo Station in 2015 is a bigger story than 59 Acrobats or 20 Zoo Stations in 2018.
These songs have always been in the bands peripheral view and they are always keen to revisit.
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
The songs aren’t ‘missed’. They just aren’t in the designed setlist for the particular tours you mentioned. Why is 360 the focal point of your stats? Without the delay in that tour meaning Glastonbury coincided with the 20th anniversary, i highflying doubt that setlist would have been what it was.
The band didn’t ‘miss’ playing Joshua Tree songs in 2018. It could be argued the shows suffered for it. They just didn’t fit the set they designed or the period in time the 2018 tour took place in.
Originally posted by deanallison:[..]
Missed, not played, whatever the terminology isn’t important and 360 was my focal point because Kieran mentioned it but also if we’re looking at the number of JT songs performed since vertigo to JT2017 its comparable in terms of years between tours and number of songs.
Originally posted by deanallison:[..]
Yes the band clearly did think about these songs and this period of their career on 2 brief occasions at the end of 360 and the last third of E&I. And they only did so for E&I because they were returning to Berlin at the end of the tour and wanted to come up with a different narrative for the show that wasn’t too similar to I&E. The 360 celebration didn’t feature any surprises from the album really, underplayed songs but nothing that they shouldn’t be playing regularly, Ultra Violet was the most obscure on the 3 occasions it was played at that stage of the tour but it had already featured heavily on 360 and wasn’t about celebrating AB.
Originally posted by germcevoy:[..]
I'm too confused to carry on now.