Originally posted by emielwhy not play under 10.000 ??? they played at that time before 9000 people over there .....
that's a 1000 people - 10.000 ....= 9000 .....(irving plaza /brooklyn bridge ??? under the 10.000)
i don't know maybe the venue is now a day bigger then 25 years ago .....
maybe they rebuilt it that there's more seats now a day ....
i will search it on the internet ....
Originally posted by LikeASongNowadays U2 can NOT play in a venue under the capicity of 10.000 people...
Originally posted by BelgianBono[..]
I think you're an amazing group if you CAN play for "only a few" people...
We all know U2 can easily rock a whole Stadium and that's great
But they will be amazing if they play for a less bigger audience
And i'm not sure to say they won't do it...
We all know sometimes it can be very boring to tour for about 2 years, always playing quite the same songs in quite the same atmosphere
So they search variation in there songs but why not playing for a "small" (cause 9000 is still a LOT!) audience ? I think they'll enjoy it ! The only problem is for the visitors : think how many people would fight for a ticket
Originally posted by LikeASong[..]Well, they're not really Full concerts, you know what I mean. 10 songs, 5 songs, not a complete show.
I can't imagine a nowadays U2 show (with Vertigo, Elevation, Until The End, Mysterious Ways, etc.) at Red Rocks...