Originally posted by opsopcopolis:[..]
lol If that were the whole picture then why has U2 ever used production at all? Shouldn’t they show up to the stadium with an empty stage and a few PAR cans? You think 360 was an exercise in cost savings?
There’s a very real possibility that sphere production cost less to the group than any of their normal tours because they didn’t have to design and source the actual infrastructure for the shows
Originally posted by felix2:[..]
I agree with you on the second paragraph.
It's still about the simply created gifs and the colorful pictures also called jpegs. The pictures were just blobbed. In german means (aufblobben). What's new about it?
Originally posted by felix2:[..]
I agree with you on the second paragraph.
It's still about the simply created gifs and the colorful pictures also called jpegs. The pictures were just blobbed. In german means (aufblobben). What's new about it?
Originally posted by opsopcopolis:I was the sphere Sunday for phish. Happy to post my full comparison review if people are interested, but the short version is I thought the phish show was generally on par with the u2 shows, just very different. Phish obviously leaned into the flexible psychedelic imagery, and I thought it was really well done. That said, it lacked the cohesion and overall image quality/progression that the u2 show had. Both fit the individual band’s style, and I’m really excited to see how the venue continues to develop. I’m headed to dead and co on the first weekend
Originally posted by kris_smith87:[..]
I can't wait to see what someone like Beyonce and her team could do in that space. After seeing Renaissance last summer, pushing the boundaries of concert visuals is alive and well with her.