Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
I have always been an advocate of the theory that the 26, 27 and 30 Point Depot bootlegs are not proper soundboard recordings, AND they are not proper audience recordings either. I bet my money that these recordings were made with a professional external microphone (just like you'd make an audience recording), BUT from the mixing desk, by someone with the right contacts – or someone from the U2 camp directly. There are certain things that give these recordings away, like the presence of close clappers & ocassional chats, which is something you'd rarely (if ever) find on a pure soundboard recording. There are also more subtle and intangible things, like the "warm & balanced feel" that they have, as opposed to the classic cold-soundboard sound that you'd find in, for example, Syracuse '87 or Washington '92.
One of my best friends -who is also a U2start member and an avid bootleg collector- is a sound engineer specialized in venue acoustics and he agrees with my theory based on his observations regarding the recording's echo, freqs and reverb – so I feel it's not far fetched at all
Originally posted by ASortOfDesire:[..]
Wow, what a compilation, thank you!
Originally posted by Papo:In 1993 a guy at a record store in Temple Bar, Dublin, told me that the Point Depot recordings were indeed given to various people/record store owners in Temple Bar by The Edge himself, as a thank you-present for support and for providing the band with rare recordings of their own work for archival purpose. The Point Depot recordings were intentionally meant to be bootlegged and sold in Temple Bar, where you could buy cassettes with live recordings back in those days.
I'm not making this up, but I don't know if he did.
Originally posted by unclejosh:[..]
well Syracuse and Washington were both mono boards recorded onto video tape if i am not mistaken. They might be in very limited stereo but they were recorded as the audio track to the VHS tapes I believe. They both sound like crap compared to the 89 Lovetown shows.
By soundboard I don't mean some random dude plugged into the board or recorded the video feed and ripped the audio from the in house system. I am talking the recordings used by the broadcast people for the NYE broadcast. Just like the Paris HD video that was leaked in 2015. Those were practice recordings to work out the kinks. I mean I could be wrong, but I have never heard ANY audience recording professionally miked or not that sound as good as the Lovetown shows and I have been listening to live recordings going on 30 years now and have thousands and thousand of bootlegs. I admit I could be wrong and I am no sound engineer but even the very best of audience recordings I have heard from any band does not come close to those shows in clarity and mix.
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
That is really interesting and hard to believe, although it kind of makes sense
Originally posted by Papo:[..]
He also told me that the band had to face harsh criticism in 1989 for playing The Point and for the tickets being to expensive and he guessed that the band wanted to do something nice....
Originally posted by LikeASong:[..]
Were tickets really that expensive?...........
Originally posted by u2joost:[..]
Not by todays standards. But this was almost 30 years ago...
Originally posted by Papo:[..]
He also told me that the band had to face harsh criticism in 1989 for playing The Point and for the tickets being to expensive and he guessed that the band wanted to do something nice....